Philosophy and the Next Generation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Philosophy and the Next Generation - Term Paper Example This is not a perfect situation for them to have faith in something or to follow the philosophies of religions. We have seen that when things are related to religions there is a big clash of opinions. The next generation will have a very promising life if they atheists. They can live in harmony even without religions. Religions hold a certain group of people together not everyone. This will avoid a lot of problems. Atheism will force the next generation to love people irrespective of religion. Religion is a very emotional thing. Religions were created for the purpose of keeping people united. For example a Christian might say, "I know Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. By following his teachings, I will live in heaven when I die." This is the same thing a Muslim would say. But the teachings in both the religions are almost the same. Both the religions ask people to live in love, harmony and peace. So why should the next generation be guided in terms of religions even after knowing t he basic motive of the religions. They have the support of technology, knowledge, education everything to live their life in a very effective way. Religions are here a big cause for fights and troubles. I personally believe that there is no need of a religion to do good things. Anyone can do it. Especially, when a person is not locked by religious beliefs his potential to do good things is really high. I want my children to grow up without being blinded by religions. Nobody will ever say, that a person was a good Christian or a good Muslim, they always say he or she was a good human being. So what is the significance of religion here. And also a lot of people are killing each other in the name of religions. They were created to educate people about living in harmony and peace. When that itself is creating a big problem, what is the use of being religious. Nobody will judge you on the basis of religion you belong to but they will definitely judge you on what you are and how you are w ith your life. Absolute truth is one main philosophy, which has been talked a lot about. An absolute truth, sometimes called a universal truth, is an unalterable and permanent fact. The concept of absolute truths - what they are and whether they exist - has been debated among many different groups of people. Philosophers have waded in the muck of defining absolute truth for millennia. For example, Plato believed that absolute truth existed, but that truth on earth was merely a shadow of great forms of absolute truth existing in the universe. Alternatively, many believe in relative truths, where facts may vary depending on the circumstances. People often look to science to determine whether something constitutes an absolute truth, but science tends to avoid absolutism. Even when scientists reasonably believe an explanation, it is often couched as theory or proofs. However, as we advance in science, we often find ourselves disproving proofs. Yet a great deal of proof on a subject makes it more likely , but does not make it absolute truth. Many religions contain absolute truths. This is something which is very subjective. There are lots of arguments about it. For example, to the Christian the absolute truth is Jesus Christ is the Lord and Savior. Imposing this statement, which is an absolute truth according the Christians, will pave way for a big argument because Jesus Christ is not everyone's lord. When a person's absolute truth is

A Critique of Plato's Just Society Using the Notion of Fairness From Assignment

A Critique of Plato's Just Society Using the Notion of Fairness From John Rawls - Assignment Example The most explicit discussion of the tripartite part of the soul and the primacy of reason therein occurs in the fourth book of the Republic (435b). One of the first preliminary aspects of the soul is that although the parts of the soul are distinct in their virtues, Socrates also stresses that in the functioning of these parts, the soul must be considered as a â€Å"whole† [Plato, 1992, p. 436a]. What is implied by this, is as follows? If for example, one desired food, and this desire originated in the appetites, it would still require reason both to discern the means of satisfying this desire, but also it would require reason to know when one has had enough for the sake of health in which case, reason would act upon the ‘will’ to suppress desire, so to speak. This is a ‘chain of command’, so to speak, which will be explored both as it is outlined in this section of the Republic, but also in terms of how this is established in the three classes of the state [Haworth, 2004, p. 13]. Further, it is important to similarly stress that the appetites are as necessary for the reason for the sake of surviving. In other words, someone who had no appetite would starve, just as someone who had no ‘will’ or ‘spirit’ would have no discipline to stop eating or drinking. Thus, Socrates stresses that although the reason is given privilege within the scheme of the soul, he also stresses that all three aspects constitute the ‘whole’, and this ‘whole’ is necessary for surviving. In some ways, his position on the soul can be said to be a refutation of Thrasymachus position from the beginning of the dialogue where he argues that the just society is the one ruled by the â€Å"stronger† [Adams and Dyson, 2003, p. 4].  Ã‚